The story recounts the early life of Genghis Khan who was a slave before going on to conquer half the world in 1206. As a stand alone film, it is technically brilliant and wonderfully acted. 91. Negative: 1. The director of the film was Sergei Bodrov and was assisted by Arif Aliev and Bodrov who took part as the screen play writers. With Tadanobu Asano, Amadu Mamadakov, Khulan Chuluun, Honglei Sun. I also thought the costumes and sets were wonderful and gave a feeling of accuracy to me that added to the entire movie experience. Sure, it's an extremely streamlined version of what happened (no Toghrul/Wang Khan is a huge omission, for example, and the weird Tangut interlude never happened), but it also really gets the feel and atmosphere of the thing correct, and liberally uses actual anecdotes found in the Secret History. Unfortunately, the film quickly gets repetitive.

The director of the film was Sergei Bodrov and was assisted by Arif Aliev and Bodrov who took part as the screen play writers. Not accurate at all.

Looking at my watch, I realized nearly two hours had passed and the story was into its third repetition of the same subplot.

I have no idea if this movie is historically accurate, but I do know that I came away with a feeling that I learned a considerable amount about the Mongol culture. Critic score Publication By date.
Mongol is quite a good film, but does feel a bit incomplete, largely because the rest of the planned trilogy has yet to come to fruition. Heroism of Genghis Khan The movie Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan is a semi-historical film that describes about the early life of Temujin, who later came to be known as Genghis Khan.

Picturehouse Entertainment | Release Date: June 6, 2008: CRITIC SCORE DISTRIBUTION 74: METASCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 27 Critic Reviews. Mongol, alias Genghis Khan: The Early Years, may compress, elide and telescope biographical details (as movies have been known to do) as it … Surname 1 Name Institution Course Tutor Date Historical accuracy of the movie ‘’Mongol’’ Mongol is a semi- historical film originating from Russia and revolves on the early life Temujin, who was later known as Genghis Khan. Mixed: 4. Directed by Sergei Bodrov.

However, I did feel as though the direction could have been a bit more inspired. Sergei Bodrov's "Mongol" is a ferocious film, blood-soaked, pausing occasionally for passionate romance and more frequently for torture.
The battle scenes had just enough gore to add realism without going over the top with guts and yuck. We certainly aren't seeing the true Genghis Khan. As a visual spectacle, it is all but overwhelming, putting to shame some of the recent historical epics from Hollywood. Mongol covers his early life and first steps to power, while he still went by his given name, Temüjin.

However, historical accuracy is not Bodrov's intent. Likewise, the movie shows brief of his childhood and how he became the Great Khan, but it ends when Temujin finally became Genghis Khan.

Mongol is a throwback to a more respectable tradition.

Mongol started out with a lot of promise and for the first half hour I thought I was watching a really great film. Watch Now Buy On: Critic Reviews.

Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan. Since there is virtually no information about the early life of Gengis Khan and his rise to power, the film Mongol can be safely regarded as a work of complete fiction. Surname 1 Name Institution Course Tutor Date Historical accuracy of the movie ‘’Mongol’’ Mongol is a semi- historical film originating from Russia and revolves on the early life Temujin, who was later known as Genghis Khan. But where any movie is concerned a question like yours always has more than one answer.

Positive: 22.

Actually, on the subject of accuracy, Mongol is a film that really stands out. Originally Answered: How historically accurate is the film "Mongol"? As is, Mongol was glacially slow at times and was a little too eager to have CGI blood effects. Peter Rainer. I haven’t yet seen 1917 (though I’m curious to), so you might think I have no business answering your question. Mongol is very much a "based off a true story" kind of movie. The film is riddled with historical inaccuracies, he is captured three times during the film, in reality he was only captured once.