Irish Web Developer

Over the last number of weeks, there has been a war of words between Adobe and Apple about the availability of the Flash player on Apple’s products such as the iPhone and iPad.

I have to say I think Apple’s behavior in this has been appalling. The only reason that Apple are doing this is for money. If they allowed the flash player on these devices, developers could make applications available to users without the need to provide them through the app-store and thus deny apple their cut.

According to Steve Jobs, Adobe Flash is a closed proprietary, whereas Apple is all about the open-source with Webkit. That’s great, but Webkit has nothing to do with this debate.

The Adobe Flash platform is a lot more open than Apple’s mobile platform. Let’s compare them.

To develop an iPhone application I can use xcode, Apple’s development environment, that’s it nothing else. To create a swf file that runs in the flash player I can use haxe, flash develop or fdt. There are loads more and none of these come from Adobe.

Once you have created my application, it doesn’t get any better. To make an iphone application available to the public, a developer has to pay a fee of $99. This fee allows developers to submit their application for the appstore. First, however, it has to be reviewed by Apple. This review process has resulted in a lot of denials and not just apps made by small independent developers. Google have had at least 2 apps denied, Google Voice and Google Latitude when they submitted them to the app store. On the other hand, once you have created an application on the flash platform you can share it however you wish.

Steve Jobs states performance as one of the reasons why xcode is the only dev environment allowed. This makes the assumption that if developers use something other than xcode, the apps will not perform as well. In that case, why not let these apps be developed on different platforms and add performance to the review process. That way, apps that are badly written on xcode are caught as well.

From a technology point of view, it doesn’t really make any sense. There are loads of developers out there who create great apps. Why is Apple forcing them to use their tools?

But lets look at it from Apple’s point of view. Why should they let the Flash on their products? There is absolutely no reason why they should. It just means that users will have less choice. They can only install apps from the app store. They are creating a closed system and history has shown that when a closed system challenges a open system, the open system always wins.

I love Apple’s products, I’m using a MacBook to write this post, but at the moment if someone offered me the choice between an iPhone or a Google Nexus One Android phone, I’d have to go with the Nexus One.

Tell someone about it:

This is hillarious, Read Write Web do a story about aol and Facebook doing a deal to integrate facebook into Aol’s instant messanger. The story ranks really well for the term “Facebook Login” on Google.

Have a look at the comments to get an idea of the calibre of facebook user.

Maybe teaching facebook in schools is not too far-fetched.

Tell someone about it:

With all the snow around at the moment, roads in Ireland are treacherous. Now the government has told us that there are only 2 days worth of grit available. Going to work is rapidly becoming an extreme sport.

Imagine though, if you didn’t have to leave your house. Imagine if all your work was available to you where ever you have an internet connection. That is the power of cloud computing. You can access your data anywhere. Not only that, you can also work on it.

There are loads of applications that are solely based on-line. In fact, you can do pretty much anything in web based applications. The only limitations seem to be video/imaging editing although even that is changing.

For business applications salesforce.com is definitely worth a look. If you are involved in sales, marketing or services having a salesforce account at the moment could be a life-saver.  The ability to log on from anywhere, even from an iphone or blackberry, offers a huge advantage over on premise software solutions, especially in the weather conditions we have at the moment.

Not to mention the fact that the TCO is lower for cloud based solutions. No need for expensive hardware or the staff to maintain it.

So if the climate (economic or meteorological) is bad, maybe you should be working in the cloud.

Tell someone about it:

Well it’s January again so I’m going to start a personal project. The project I have in mind is really ambitious so I don’t want to go into details but it will be built in Django and hosted on Google App Engine.

The reasons for using these technologies are many-fold. I really want to learn Django and today I found app-engine-patch which allows better integration between Django and Google App Engine.

Anyway, back to my project. I think that the way people consume news is going to change in the future. I think that people like @marklittlenews have recognized this. I don’t think for a second that 6 0ne or newspapers are going away any time soon.

I do however think that the way we, the public, view the news is changing. The crash-landing on the Hudson in 2009 is a good example. It was all over twitter before it was on the news. Photos included. With a video camera included in nearly every phone. For example, my phone (the HTC Hero) has a video camera built in. I can even post videos directly to youtube. I can even stream videos live using a service like Qik. Photos are the same. Soon any news event will be broadcast on the web as soon as it happens.

Features will also be online. The excellent site Pictory is an example of the direction that I think features will go in.

So what does this mean for Journalists? Even with news events being captured as they happen, the background information, the meat of the story, will still be important. Usually, this comes from a built up network of contacts that comes from years covering stories.

And  so, the project I am planning to build is a platform that brings the on the spot user generated news together with the experience and skill of journalists.

It’s an ambitious project, but what is the point of aiming low? There is a good chance that nothing will come of this, but hopefully I will learn something along the way.

Tell someone about it:

It appears that the long-awaited Apple tablet may be coming on the 26th of January.

This is Apple’s traditional time for big announcements. The big Apple convention MacWorld used to be on at this time of year.

Apparently, back in 2007, Apple registered the domain iSlate.com. That, with the rumors coming from Chinese screen manufacturers seem to point to a 10 inch tablet.

It will be interesting to see if Apple can do for tablet computing, what it did for the mobile.

Personally, I don’t see a future or tablet computers. I think a touch-screen would be really difficult to type on long term. I think tablets are more suited to graphical type applications. I don’t think there will ever be a novel written on a touchscreen.

Who knows though? Apple have surprised us in the past.

Tell someone about it:

Well not quite.

A new Irish satirical blog worth checking out is The Daily Blogicle.

Tell someone about it:

Google have released a sync app for the iphone and windows mobile. It will also support some Nokia and Sony Ericsson phones.

Basically, what it does is keeps your calendars and contacts the same over your devices. There are other apps that do the same thing, like Apples mobile me and Microsoft Exchange.

The main advantage of the Google app is that it is free. Of course, it’s also in Beta. Read all about it.

Tell someone about it:

This is the US airways flight being removed from the Hudson. 18 photos

(more…)

Tell someone about it: